Welcome

Welcome to my Blog. I mostly re post articles that i find interesting on the web. After the article you will find a link that leads you to the original one.

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

EECB Against EZ Lube Gets $50 Returned To Hoodwinked Customer [Success Stories]

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 3/30/09

An EZ Lube store in California overcharged Timothy for a new cabin filter when he went to get his oil changed. The mechanic managed to do this by quizzing Timothy on his knowledge of air filters, then using that info to make vague assurances that sounded good but didn't convey the actual, final price. Timothy admits that he let his guard down, but when he was hit with the final bill, he regained his consumerist footing and began to take steps to remedy the situation—and he succeeded.

love reading the posts and used some of the skills I have learned from them to clear up a recent issue I had with EZ Lube. I will preface this with an acknowledgment that I made a major error of judgment. I know better, however, I fell victim to the dreaded "Air Filter" scam at EZ Lube. I learned long ago not to ever buy an air filter or have one installed by an oil change business, as they are always overpriced and ripoffs.

Unfortunately, I let my guard down when I went on March 26th to EZ Lube #093 in San Diego, CA for a simple oil change. First, I was pushed to get a synthetic mix oil change for $52.99, which I immediately balked at, but was then told that I was a "VIP" and that they would take $8 off. I was doing this on my lunch break, so I said sure, just get it done. I signed the estimate form and went and ran an errand. I came back and waited a few minutes before I was asked to join the service technician for a 14-point inspection. Here, they had my air filter and cabin filter atop the engine, accenting the dust and particles that the filter had acquired over the past 5,000 miles or so. The technician quizzed me on my air filter, which I told him I do myself. He then pressed me on the cabin filter, which I had never installed before. My ignorance in this area proved to be my downfall, as the technician informed me that they can change this in no time and that they charge the same price auto stores do. With that, I agreed and again walked away informing them that I needed to get going soon.

My car was completed and I went to pay for the bill. I was told my total was over $140 and I refused to pay. I told them that this was ridiculous and that I was never told the Cabin filter would cost $70.

The cashier muttered something about a HEPA filter and that these things are expensive. A manager approached and immediately took off $20, and I begrudgingly agreed. I paid with my credit card, since I felt this was shady and wanted to protect my options. I then hopped on my phone and Google'd the cabin filter's SKU. Guess what? Amazon and others sell this thing for $15-$20 tops. So, I got home and emailed my story to EZ Lube corporate. Within 24 hours, I received a phone call from Todd Mann with Corporate. We discussed what had happened, what documents I signed and what estimates I was provided. He informed my that the $70 cabin filter was likely due to labor and service fees associated with the part. I informed him that I have no issue paying for services which I am not an expert in and cannot do on my own, however I felt that I was taken advantage of and that this was simply a ripoff. He informed me that they would issue a refund on the air filter if there were inconsistencies with the paperwork they provided me, as EZ Lube apparently has requirements for proper documentation of services.

I scanned and emailed my receipt and invoice to Todd, and today was informed that I would receive $50 from EZ Lube due to the inconsistencies in the store's documents.

Though I feel that I won my little battle here, I think it is fair to say that this scam will continue. Hopefully more people will learn from my mistake and many of the other stories out there on oil change businesses and their practice of scamming with air filters. Thanks for continuing to fight the good fight!

AT&T Supervisor Takes Back Refund Offer Because You Dared To Question Her [P...

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 3/30/09

Claire was told the wrong thing by an AT&T Wireless rep regarding international long distance, but when she called back to sort things out, she came up against the Nurse Ratched of the AT&T call center—a woman who refused to give in, or offer any help at all. In fact, when Claire finally admitted defeat and said she'd accept the credit that had been offered to her, the supervisor refused. Apparently Claire only had one chance to accept that and since she said no, it was off the table.

Here's Claire's story:

Last week I had to call my friend in the UK and to do so had to call AT&T to activate my cellphone for international calls. The representative was very informative about what I was adding onto my plan but we obviously had a miscomunication because when I asked her whether the $1.39/minute to call the UK would just come out of my monthly minute allowance at a higher rate, she said yes. Having spent about 45 minutes on the phone with AT&T, I have discovered that this was obviously not their policy. I asked the representative point blank: "so I will not incure any extra charges until I've run out of my monthly minutes?" and she agreed. Well the latest bill says that I owe them $60 for that one phone call to the UK and I still have 843 roll over minutes.

When I called AT&T today the first agent I spoke to listened to what I had to say and offered to refund me 50% of the charge but I felt that this miscommunication should entitle me to a full refund- or just take the full amount out of my 800 odd minutes! He explained that a manager would not be able to offer me more but he would refund me 50% of the charge- anymore and he might get in trouble.

That's when I asked to speak to someone who wouldn't get in trouble for giving me the full refund. About 10 minutes later a woman came on the line and explained that these were "valid charges and are therefore final." I tried explaining the miscommunication but she had nothing of it explaining that she could only base her decisions off the notes on my account. I ventured that if what I had been told was not their policy, the rep probably wouldn't add that to the notes. We went back and forth for about 10 minutes but all the supervisor had to say was: "The rep informed you of these charges and they are valid charges. There is nothing more I can do for you."

In a moment of clarity I asked for them to pull up the conversation I had—she could then hear where the confusion had stemmed from! The supervisor explained that the rep I had spoken to was not one of her agents so she could not pull up our conversation.

Sensing defeat and not wanting to spend any more time on this I said I would take the 50% off, but the supervisor explained that because I had said "no" to the agent before, she would not offer this to me again. So I'm basically being punished for not backing down. This threw me into a whirlwind. I simply cannot understand this schoolyard mentality.

In the end I asked if she coulnd't pull up the phone records, who would I need to speak to? She told me to go to the "contact us" portion of att.com where I could email them my complaint. Because I was so frusrated at this point, I didn't bother to take anyone's name and in restrospect I should have gone to the website with the supervisor still on the phone because I just visited their site to write an email and got this message:

You selected: Airtime charges/overages.
For faster service, we can best help you with this question over the phone.

Claire, we think you should take your argument up to higher levels at AT&T Mobility. Send them a letter explaining what happened, and ask them to provide the original 50% off compromise at the very least. You should also let them know specificall how this supervisor treated you. It's unfortunate you didn't get any names, but since this just happened you should be able to provide a very accurate timestamp of the call.

Here are some links to AT&T contact info and EECBs on our site. You can also try the information below:

AT&T Mobility
5565 Glenridge Connector
Atlanta, GA 30342
United States - Map
+1-404-2366000 (Phone)

Ralph de la Vega, CEO [we couldn't find an email address at this time]

Possible "Office of the President" numbers:
Eastern States 877-707-6220
Western States 800-498-1912

(Cubicle farm: webg33k)

Some People Still Think Generic Meds Are Somehow Inferior [Health]

via Consumerist by Ben Popken on 3/30/09

There are people out there who really think the name-brand slapped on conveys some kind of magical properties to medicine not covered in the active ingredient list, as Janet's sad story of how she got humiliated by her boss shows:

Janet writes:

My boss gave me a list of a few things to pick up for him at CVS last week. Advil liquid gels were on the list. I bought him the CVS brand of liquid gels with the same milligrams of ibuprofen in them. When I returned he flipped out on me saying that they are not the same and these won't work as well. He told me to keep my penny pinching to my own purchases. Then a few days later he brought it up in front of a few other co-workers. They all agreed with him.

The CVS brand costs half of what Advil costs for the same thing, while I thought I was doing him a favor, I was setting myself up for laughter, apparently. This made me think, how many other people out there believe this? Over-the-counter medications give you a list and amount of ingredients right on the back, if everything is exactly the same, why spend twice as much?

It makes me feel like I must be taking crazy pills.

Don't feel too bad, Janet, some of those co-workers may have just been nodding their head because they want to keep their job. At least now you know in your office who can't think for themselves (your boss + those people).

(Photo: yoshiffles)

Yum! Wants Feedback Only From Ancient Ones, Mummies, Civil War Veterans [Age...

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 3/30/09

Want to provide some feedback to Yum! Brands, the company behind KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Long John Silver's, and A&W Restaurants? No matter how old you are—they go back as far as Jan 1st, 1906—they'll tell you that you're too young to use the "Contact Us" part of their website. Yum! is in it for the long haul, and they don't need a bunch of jibber-jabber from hooligans like you.

"Contact Us" [Yum] (Thanks to JB!)

Restaurant Owner Busted For Filming Women's Bathroom [Scary]

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 3/30/09

Police say that the owner of the Poloros Restaurant in Mineola, NY had a hidden surveillance camera installed in the ceiling tiles of the women's bathroom. The device, which was used by the owner to watch customers and female employees alike, was spotted by a customer, who notified police.

The camera was wired via cable to his private office in the basement, where the owner could view the video on a monitor, according to police.

The owner has been arrested and charged with two counts of second-degree unlawful surveillance.

Cops: Restaurant owner had camera in bathroom [Newsday]
(Photo:Google Streets View)